I muse that 'fun' is the ingredient that needs to be in all relationships for them to be alive. How alive are my relationships?
Is 'fun' the word I'm looking for? I am searching about. The word I want describes a sort of 'reciprocity' that offers a mutually rewarding interaction between parties.
I consider that this is even a necessary condition for my (notional) relationship with my pet fish. If the fish does nothing for me, I get rid of the fish. I put food out for the birds. If the birds come at night and eat my food without me seeing them, do I continue to put food out?
Can I have a relationship with an inanimate object? I child may have a teddy that may go everywhere with it. Does this mean they have a relationship with the teddy? Is it reciprocal? Does the teddy communicate?
In all relationships there's communication. Even 'no' communication is communication. (Waltzlawick 1972)
Can I have a living relationship with my dead father? I love him dearly. I remember his words and influence, but is this a reciprocal relationship?
Can I have a relationship with my Creator? Will it be a real relationship if God is dead?
Can I have a reciprocal relationship with a living Jesus?
Will if be fun for us both? Will we both experience it as mutually joyful?
These are my Easter thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment