Thursday 30 January 2014

Baked Fig Ball


Margaret gave me a Seggiano Baked Fig Ball for Christmas.  She knows me well.  It was wonderful.

Melvin Bragg in his book 'The Book of Books' mentions how David, saved an abandoned Egyptian slave of maurording Amalekites with part of a fig ball.

1 Samuel 30
12 And they gave him a piece of a cake of figs, and two clusters of raisins: and when he had eaten, his spirit came again to him: for he had eaten no bread, nor drunk any water, three days and three nights.

13 And David said unto him, To whom belongest thou? and whence art thou? And he said, I am a young man of Egypt, servant to an Amalekite; and my master left me, because three days agone I fell sick.

King James Version 1611.






Monday 27 January 2014

Book of Books versus Book of Nature

I am reading Melvin Bragg's 'The Book of Books', the story of the King James Version.


It was a bit of a surprise to me how poor Bragg's prose style comes across.  I am a great fan of his Radio 4 show 'In our time'.  I see him as infinitely talented.

Bragg feels that 'The King James' version, which rings though his book like a trade brand;  "take three verses from 'The King James Version', and repeat them 25 times.,." is the only version acknowledged as being of any value.  Also he believes in the dominance of the English translation, "did Shakespeare help compose those psalms before he died in 1616?"  I know that the bible has existed in numerous ancient texts from Armenia, to Egypt and Ethiopia with not a hint of English.

Bragg has no faith in Christianity, but notes that it has provided important 'continuity and substance' for our culture.  The King James version has provide a common cultural heritage for many generations. Bragg feels that sadly it's era has passed, and his book is its epitaph.  However he will not allow Richard Dawkin free reign to lay into the carcass, and would like to see it more reverently disposed of.

In the past the two books that were held as the authority over all in the English speaking world where 'The Book of Books' (The Bible), and the 'Book of Nature', or our experience of the world.  For centurys the two were seen in complete harmony.  This is now seen as a ridiculous assumption.

For me as a believer, I am left to square my argument with Bragg.  Firstly, the argument of science versus faith falls flat for me. I see this as the comparison between the 'land' and 'sea'.  Both exist, but saying one disproves the other in nonsense.  I am not convinced by the 'God of the Gaps' assertion.  Certain 'gaps' persist, for example life after death, and the nature of love.

Here are the conundrums that I feel are important to me.

Evolutionary theory reasons that human brain development was significantly facilitated by scheming duplicitous reproductive deceit and the selfish maximising of advantage. This implies that the 'good' creator works in mysterious ways.  However, one can argue that this brain development occurred whilst species development  pre-dated the rise of humanoids.  There is no evidence for current evolution of humanity.  people are not becoming smarter, or stronger. It is argued that the unique difference between humans and the rest of the natural world is the presence of a conscious, and the presence of morality.  Has 'guilt' every been observed in the natural world?  The story of the tree in Eden is the story that signifies this beginning.  It also helps me understand why deceit, avarice and selfishness are ever present human experiences.  Perhaps they are just under the skin (or cortex).  Dawkin would banish sin and guilt.  But it is easier said than done.

Bragg asserts that miracles are all to do with human imagination.  For me the presence of miracles are significant because they indicate that our scientific knowledge is limited.  This I understand is one of David Hume's central thesis.  As Bragg says, lots of Dawkin's assumptions are based on scientific thought that may one day be discredited, like much human thought in the past.  Let us remember this.  For me, my prayers are crucial to my faith.  If God does not appear to bring some resolution to serious issues about me, my faith is tested.  This does not mean prayer is magic.  It means I am asking for something meaningful to come out of the chaos I feel.  I have a number of person friends who live in great suffering.  I ask for their suffering to be relieved, but I want more, I want their suffering to be meaningful, not wasted.  Perhaps, just as evolutionary theory implicates deceit in the development of the complex brain, I am looking for something similar in the pain I see about me.

I also agree with Bragg that the biblical stories fit into a much greater human whole.  They are but one human experience, and must be seen in the context of all other human experiences, including the many we know nothing about.  For me, one creator, supreme over all creation, is not limited by one book. It is argued also that it has existed for only a fraction of human existence. Other human experiences do reflect the essence of human meaning, (or lack of it).  However, I experience the bible as of relevance to me, and note the same with fellow believers about me.  It provides the framework for belief that is necessary to create security and stability, much the same as 'house rules' provided by a parent help nurture secure relationships. For me, this is 'the truth', in the same way that I respect the 'truth' provided by my family.  The difference here is that my expectation of The Creator, is greater than it is for my parents.

The bible, as Bragg rightly points out, is famous for being on everyone side.  It does not provide us with a neat 'sown up' world.  In many places it deserves an 'x' rating.  In other places it can not fail to stir up annoyance and confusion (is this deliberate?)  We will still need to seek divine wisdom, invoke compassion, and stir up that grey matter.





Saturday 25 January 2014

Urban Circle

Leicester City Cycle Round

As the pedals turn, so churns a new line of thought; as with a dynamo, the motion provides the power.  Here is a record of my thoughts from today's cycle ride.

The First of 11 Leicester Parks
This first bit is the route is taken by Joanna and her friends everyday.  The pavement is worn.  Like Thomas Hardy, who walked the same routes over many years, so my girls have observed these street.  I turn down Linden Avenue.  In Jikin, Czechia, we walked down a linden avenue for two miles.  My thoughts returned to that lazy hot walk with Theo, saved for me by a cherry plum tree, as we had not brought water with us.

(1) Evington Park, like a number of Leicester Parks, was the estate of a grand house.  The Victorian edifice still stands and is used for council staff training.  Across the park I curl through a small estate on the edge of the General Hospital.  This hospital land was sold off some years ago to pay a bill; like a gently declining family, letting go of their Georgian teapot.

The route passes a large green expanse of one of the city's reservoirs.  I wonder why the top cannot be used as a football pitch.  Images come to me of the pitch giving way and players falling... and water being contaminated!  I remember a football pitch we visited in Hong Kong.  It was on a covered reservoir, though it did have big pipes sticking up though it, like ventilation shafts on old steamer.
Lily Marriot,
described as a Leicester radical

Next through (2) Lily Marriot Park.  I know the Marriots where special to Leicester.  It is nice to have a park named after a woman.  I wonder if she or her husband gave name to the primary school.  The road passes by the shadow of two once high and ghastly tower blocks.  I remember going alone into one tower block to retrieve a fourteen year old boy who had run away from his parent.  He lived with a feral community of boys.  As I was there, beer bottles were being flung from the windows, and the scene of dereliction in the flat was impressive.  No 'twin towers' when these came down.
No tears when these came down.
Next through the gap between an old embankment and the (3) Rally Park. This is a great park for dens and adventures as the old steam railway line is now 'open access'.  Across the main Uppingham Road, past the terrace where our Iranian friends first encountered slugs (no slugs where they came from).  Then up to the old mental hospital, The Towers.  This place still has an effect on the older population of Leicester.

A fine Victorian Lunatic Asylum
 One building was named 'Daisy Peak' after a former inhabitant who was perfectly well.  She used to make tea for all visitors, and although became institutionalised, remained a loving and delightful all her life.  The building is soon to become a state funded Sikh School.  It's grounds are now open to the public as (4) Towers Park

The route now crosses the estate of Northfields.  I did a community study of this estate when I was a student.  I remember meeting people who were some of the first to move in.  I was fascinated by the social history.  Fine houses with large gardens, but on the wrong side of the road.

Now the route passes through (5) Rushey Fields.  Across the Belgrave road, I took a path next to a brook, leading to the River Soar.  This is part of old Belgrave, and some of the fine old houses still exist, such as Belgrave Hall.

Then over the old bridge and through a soviet style housing estate up to the route of the old Midlands Railway.  The railway embankment is very impressive, even in winter.  A footbridge crosses over to the Steam Railway centre.  Lots of people have gathered, many retired men with cameras.  Two impressive, shiny engines are there to savour.  Cock O' the North, and Oliver Cromwell are warming up. The path banks high above the tracks before diving off into Bristall.  Bristall, that non-village; an estate for people who can not bring themselves to live in Leicester.
Leicester North Station

Next over to the top edge of Leicester.  Glebelands primary school, with is prison-like yellow roof, surely the cheapest in the catalogue.  I remembered how Margaret's own primary school, was rebuilt in Elswick, Newcastle.  They fitted a climb resistant unbreakable prison roof, knowing that anything else would be easily picked off.  However, intelligence reigns in equal proportion across all neighbourhoods.  Some children managed to break into the school.  They threw bricks up onto the roof to create dents in the metal.  Enough dents, and they had created a climbing wall.  Using the dents as grip holds, they scaled the roof, and were able to drop down into the school quadrangle.

The Northern end of Leicester is the growing tip.  Lots of road drive off to an abrupt end in muddy fields.

A bumpy though metalled track cuts straight through these new estates, on old right of way.  It crosses the (6) Castle country park, down past King William's Bridge, to Anstey.  The western By-pass roars, but is largely hidden.  This end of Leicester has fine views of Bradgate Park.
Bradgate Pak
I am in familiar territory.  My office is nearby, and I am into the lunchtime walking zone. With an increasing large number of colleagues I get out regularly for fresh air and  some lunchtime exercise.

Now past another covered reservoir.

The route crosses the locally famous Gilross Cemetery.  This is where most normal Leicester folk end up.  The graves speak of Leicester.  Not beautiful, but not boring, is my moto for our city.  Many have a variety of languages on them. I see a Ukrainian flag, and a Jewish star no the grave of a black woman.  Even in Leicester, Hindus are largely not represented here. Their dead having been disposed of through cremation, and a possible trip to the Ganges.  If you are not so well off, the River Soar sometimes has to do, and one can see floating boats of ashes and incense, like Chinese lanterns, heading off into the watery unknown. Muslims are not here.  They are over in South Wigston.
Gilross Cemetery from the air (not taken whilst cycling)

New Park Estate has not much of the park about it.  I eventually found the route that cuts though the playing fields of the once infamous New College.  It's building are so enormous, that parts of it seem to be derelict in rotation.  I did enjoy seeing the head of a ventilation shaft down to Stevenson's Glenfield tunnel, once the longest tunnel in the world (now bricked up and only opened once a year for enthusiasts).
Ventilation Shaft


Next come (7) Western Park, a fine Victorian Park, that lead straight into  (8) Braustone Park.  This park was the basis for the creation of the Braustone Estate, the Hampsted Garden Suburb of Leicester (in it's day).

In the centre of Braustone Park is the beautiful but neglected Braunston Hall.  Here Brauston has no 'e', as it relates to the village of Braunston in Rutland.  When the estate was built, the people of Rutland were worried that a confusion would be created, so the e was added.  I remembered working with a father whose life mission was to save the Hall from collapse.  It felt like a metaphor for his family, who were also in collapse through neglect.  Helplessness all round.
Braunston Hall

My route now cuts over the old Fosse Way, and on to the Great Central Way.  This cycle route we first used when visiting Lis, before our Leicester days.  Lis found us bikes and we headed into town, trying to keep up with her on the Great Central Way.

I now turn off at (9) Bede Park.  The old engine shed is now a Tescos.  We are disprove of Tescos at the moment as it is moving into our middle class enclave of Clarendon Park.  How dare they!

DeMontfort University has managed to get the road around their building closed to motorised traffic.  The cycle reigns, and our Mayor seems to be pedalling for them.

This is a route I use to cycle home from work.  It cuts round the fine brick walls of the prison, along the edge of the (10) Nelson Mandella Park (a name change vindicated), and up past Regent College, the Attinborough Centre for arts and disability, to Peace Walk, and the slow climb to the Luyten's war memorial.  I thought again of the war memorial opened by the German Kizar in 1913 to commemorate the end of War in Europe.
(11) Victoria Park, once a race course, during the war, a vegetable patch, now a fine open space, with one cycle path across it.  I moved from the footpath over to my designated area.
Peace Walk

Back home.  About 20 miles.




Monday 6 January 2014

The Communist Manifesto

I have just read the communist manifesto again.  I first read it aged 13 in preparation for the first general election I was able to observe in Britain.  I wrote to the Communist Party of Great Britain and requested some literature.  A kind comrade sent me their own copy of Marx and Engels 1848 Manifesto of the Communist Party.  I read it and returned it. I don't think they had many similar requests, but that is the story of communism in the  UK.

I must say I was not impressed.  I felt the tone was very defensive.  "and you say the communists will abolish the family"...."It is said that people will all loose their property.  We say yes, that is correct."  The main group to receive principle scorn seemed to me to be the intellectual 'socialists',  'So near and yet so far', seemed to be their error.

The basic premise of the argument for communism is flawed.  It is based on the assumption that two clear camps have evolved; the 'haves' and the 'have nots', or the plebs and the patriarchs, or the proletariat and the bourgeois. Especially in Britain, this distinction is very difficult to draw.  Even the queen is caught up in it; despite technicality being the only person not to be a subject, she is arguably the least free of all of us.

So I thought I would have a go at rewriting the Communist Manifesto, and make it more upbeat and convincing.

The Communist revolution shall not be by armed struggle, but come into being by common consent.  The people shall simply decide that they want to live a fair, just and efficient life, where all are valued.

1)  All land belongs to the people.  Similar constraints apply to air.  Land rent is abolished.  Current society looks down on the poor who claim benefits to survive.  They are described a feckless, fostering dependency, and work-shy.  The rich meanwhile make thousands from land rent, where not a iota of work is rendered for this arbitrary reward.  The ownership of land is not a right.  It is a social construct.

2)  An end to inheritance above a certain agreed amount.  It is likely that wealth will therefore be spent before death.  Fair enough.  Spend it wisely.  Inheritance is the biggest inequality in society, creating unequal advantage over generations.

3)  Transport and communication shall be jointly owned by the people.  Freedom of movement and communication are a right to all.  In the past, only the rich could travel.  Now travel will be fair, open and straightforward.  All routes will have a fixed price, and be subsidised.  Public transport will be by far the simplest and cheapest way to travel.

4) Education will be freely available to all, at all stages of life.  Education will also focus on the needs of the community, and not be dominated by any one culture.  All cultural strands will have an equal right to representation.

5)  Utility and creativity will be preferred over gain and material reward.  Cities and towns will be created as beautiful spaces.  The countryside will be treated as essential for upholding quality of life.

6) Health services will be delivered by the people, for the people. Full stop.

7) The system of merit by birth will be abolished.  Merit by intellectual performance will likewise be abolished.  In its place will be a system of merit by endeavour, creativity and courage. All people will have an equal opportunity to achieve this merit.  Intellectual excellence is to be honoured, but in this context.

8)  All work shall be designed to offer the worker satisfaction, and appropriate reward for effort, creativity and motivation.  Collective ownership of companies will be preferred.  Also cooperative models of working.  People who cannot work will be supported to feel able to contribute to society, what ever their age.  All work that benefits society will be honoured.

9)  Internationalism will be preferred to Nationalism.

10)  All people will be given freedom of conscience.  The people will be enabled to able to decide who holds power in their society.  This power will be held in reverence and respect by the holder.